Science
Conference

Issues of Liability for Violations of the Rules for Safe and Secure Use of Artificial Intelligence

Avazbek Sayfiddinov

LLM student of Tashkent State University of la
Science-Conference.com
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Date: January 7, 2024
Download PDF

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) permeates cyber defenses for government agencies and critical infrastructure providers globally, high stakes surround accountable oversight and liability for potential flaws enabling platform misuse or legal infringements. However, most legal systems currently lack statutes clarifying accountability models, technical requirements and injury restitution protocols specific to AI’s unique risks.[1] This analysis examines open debates around constructing suitable liability frameworks that balance enterprise security imperatives with individual rights protections as AI automation and autonomy spread. It spotlights challenges resolving tensions between technology vendors, deploying agencies and impacted citizens regarding emerging threat prevention technologies with inorganic reasoning capacity. [2]

Keywords

artificial intelligence (AI), cyber defense, cybersecurity, Machine learning

References

Taddeo, Mariarosaria, and Luciano Floridi. “Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race.” Nature 556, no. 7701 (2018): 296-298. 2. Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. “Artificial intelligence and administrative decision-making–An Australia perspective.” Computer Law Review International 21, no. 5 (2020): 137-143. 3. Hagendorff, Thilo. “The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines.” Minds and Machines 30, no. 1 (2020): 99-120. 4. Charisi, Vicky, et al. “Towards moral autonomous systems.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04741 (2017). 5. Smuha, Nathan A., et al. “EU regulation of AI: Fit for purpose.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 29, no. 4 (2021): 481-512. 6. falsely Reyes, Emily. “Calculating corporate liability for artificial intelligence harm.” Trade, Law and Development 12, no. 2 (2020): 269-301. 7. Scherer, Matthew U. “Regulating artificial intelligence systems: risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies.” Harv. JL & Tech. 29 (2015): 353. 8. Eggers, William D., et al. “AI-augmented government: Using cognitive technologies to redesign public sector work.” Deloitte Insights 2 (2017). 9. Završnik, Aleš. “Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights.” ERA Forum 20, no. 4 (2020): 567-583. 10. Karniouchina, Ekaterina Viktorovna, William Moore, and Kuntal Banerjee. “Estimating losses from cyber incidents: A loss function approach.” The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice 48, no. 3 (2021): 660-688.