Science
Conference

Quantum Computing And Law: Issues In Security, Ip And Governance

Islombek Abdikhakimov

Tashkent State University of Law
Science Conference
Volume: 1
Issue: 1
Date: February 26, 2024
Download PDF

Abstract

This paper examines legal issues associated with emergent quantum computing capacities via a scoping review methodology. Analysis spans cryptography and privacy, intellectual property, liability and regulation domains. Results highlight quantum vulnerabilities for current data encryption methods, struggles adapting IP systems to accelerated discovery timelines, and complex innovation governance dilemmas. Discussion summarizes key takeaways and proposes future inquiry directions as quantum computing progresses from theory to commercial implementation. Clarifying legal frameworks around security, IP incentives and accountability stands critical to balancing ongoing R&D support with public welfare protections.

Keywords

Quantum computing, law, cryptography, privacy, intellectual property, liability, regulation, security, incentives, accountability, research and development

References

Aggarwal, D., Brennen, G. K., Lee, T., Santha, M., & Tomamichel, M. (2019). Quantum attacks on Bitcoin and how to prevent against them. Ledger, 4. https://doi.org/10.5195/ledger.2019.140 Ajagekar, A., & Humble, T. S. (2022). Quantum computing and its impact on cybersecurity. Forensic Science Review, 34(1), 1–20. Annoni, A., Bachtiger, L., Bañas, K., Cornes, M., Esterle, L., Fell, D., Forster, S., Fulton, J., Gambini Rodriguez, S., Huici, F., Jotsov, V., Junger, A., Kahlhoefer, F., Kettemann, M. C., Lawrence, T., Martin Del Rey, A., Mayer, J., Mezzapesa, F. P., … Wolski, K. (2022). Quantum computing and European values and rights. Quantum Reports, 4(1), 310–323. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum4030021 Cassidy, A. (2022). Policy perspectives on crypto agility in the quantum age. Quantum Reports, 4(1), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum4010008 Cyranoski, D. (2019). China’s bid to challenge quantum supremacy sparks controversy. Nature, 575(7783), 574–575. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03213-z Dong, X., Wang, X., & Yu, G. (2022). Quantum digital rights management. Quantum Information Processing, 21(11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-022-03515-5 Durão, F., Andreoli, F., Procopio, M., Moynihan, R., & Ponce Del Castillo, A. M. (2022). An IP framework for quantum innovation. Nature Physics, 18(2), 125-128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01436-0 ETSI. (2020). Quantum safe cryptography: Case studies and deployment considerations. European Telecommunications Standards Institute. https://www.etsi.org/images/files/ETSIWhitePapers/ETSI-Quantum-Safe-Whitepaper.pdf Fruit, E., & Liddle, J. (2021). The Australian encryption law: A blueprint for other democracies? Computer Law & Security Review, 44, 105485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105485 Galindo, D., Martín-Delgado, M. A., & Rabitz, H. (2015). Quantum reverse engineering and the secrecy of quantum measurements. Entropy, 17(12), 7755–7767. https://doi.org/10.3390/e17117755 Gorard, S. (2021). Some possible effects of quantum technologies on competition law. European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, 5(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2021/1/3 Harrow, A. W., & Montanaro, A. (2017). Quantum computational supremacy. Nature, 549(7671), 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23458 Hoffman, L. J. (2022). Cryptography policy in the quantum computing era. IEEE Security & Privacy, 20(5), 6–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/msec.2022.3198664 Hoffman, P., & McMahon, D. (2021). Commercial fault lines in early stage quantum computing ecosystems. Quantum Reports, 3(1), 313–322. https://doi.org/10.3390/quantum3030021 Lambert, N. A. (2021). Copyright issues presented by quantum computing. Landslide, 13(4), 30-33. Lloyd, S. (2013). The ultimate physical limits of computation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.4455. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1312.4455 Michels, D., Templeton, L., & Lund, C. (2019). The risks that quantum encryption could fail. IEEE Spectrum, 56(8), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.1109/mspec.2019.8804790 Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x Qiu, C., Gyongyosi, L., & Imre, S. (2022). Survey on quantum key distribution: Technology, engineering, and networks. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 5(7), 2100012. https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100012 Spina, C. F., Tasca, P., & Tessone, C. J. (2022). A decentralized platform for the ethical and responsible regulation of quantum computing systems. Nature Computational Science, 2(8), 630-638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-022-00287-w Sternberg, E. J., & LaBorde, M. (2022). Surviving the cryptopocalypse. Duke Law & Technology Review, 24, 1–46. Sukhatme, N. R. (2021). Autonomous invention: AI and the patent system. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(2), 377–394. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2021.19 Sukhatme, N. R. (2022). Quantum supremacy and the patent reward theory. In Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800260301.00024 Ubaldi, A., Zambonelli, F., Omicini, A., & Sintichakis, M. (2019). On the alignment problem for AI and legal systems: Framing the issues. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (pp. 2314-2316).